Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes.  Often times this happens simply (an unintentionally) as a by-product of a mid-year change to the frequency of funding the match to something other than on a payroll period basis.

Posted

I was thinking same thing. If a SHM then adding the true-up changes the terms of the SHM and that may not fly - but I defer to others with more expertise in this area. 

One might think this doesn't hurt anyone and only helps, but if I'm smoothing out my deferrals to make sure I get the full match and then you change the terms such that I could have frontloaded my deferrals for the year (like from a bonus) and still got the full match of 4% of my pay, then I have certainly been disadvantaged. If this is done to accommodate HCEs who actually did frontload deferrals to get them invested sooner, then I also think you have a potential discrimination issue whether plan is SHM or not, IMHO. 

Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA

Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services

kprell@bpas.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...