Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Participant enrolled and deferrals withheld and timely deposited.  In September the employee reached $18,500. Payroll stopped his deferral. The  participant was over 50. Due to a  payroll glitch, the catch up contributions were not withheld.  In January the employer realized the error.  They have corrected the payroll issue.

Any action required by the employer for these "missed" deferrals?  The employer does not make a match contribution.  

Posted

Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance.

Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA
Preferred Pension Planning Corp.
corey@pppc.co

Posted

Some plans/recordkeepers/payroll systems (including my current employer) require a separate deferral election with respect to the catch up amount.

I think it's stupid/illogical and possibly some kind of violation but I have to be careful to go into our online plan portal and enter my "catch up" deferral election after I've hit the basic deferral limit.

Point being you may not have a missed deferral opportunity depending on the plan's requirements for electing "catch up" deferrals.

 

 

Posted

It never ceases to amaze me how the IRS, DOL and industry practitioners have generally absolved the participant of any and all responsibility with respect to their contributions and retirement accounts. If I'm over age 50 and knowing/expecting/wanting to save more than $18,500 then I'm going to be damn sure my contributions continue.

Or people who elect a contribution change and don't recognize (for months or even years - not a lie) that their contribution (or take home pay) never changed - hello, McFly!

Yes, plan sponsors are responsible to properly administer their plans, but I think participants should incur some responsibility as well, especially if they have received multiple sources (pay stubs, quarterly statements, etc.) that clearly show any errors.

Sorry, just my grumpy Monday rant because the 'Cuse got toasted Saturday at Va Tech and the wrong two teams are in the Super Bowl.

Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA

Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services

kprell@bpas.com

Posted

This is a missed deferral opportunity and there are stated self-correction procedures under EPCRS (generally requiring an employer QNEC contribution for part of the missed deferral).  See Rev. Proc. 2018-52 Appendix A.05(4), (5), and (9)(b).  Based on the facts provided, this likely falls under (9)(b).

Posted
On 1/28/2019 at 1:46 PM, CuseFan said:

Sorry, just my grumpy Monday rant because the 'Cuse got toasted Saturday at Va Tech and the wrong two teams are in the Super Bowl.

HOKIES! HOKIES! HOKIES! ... sorry, just a bit of fun! ;)

Posted
57 minutes ago, cheersmate said:

HOKIES! HOKIES! HOKIES! ... sorry, just a bit of fun! ;)

What was with the pink uniforms?

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted
8 minutes ago, BG5150 said:

What was with the pink uniforms?

Really, and I thought Oregon's neon green unis were obnoxious. But they played a great game so I have to give them their props and harbor no animosity to the Hokie Pokies!

Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA

Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services

kprell@bpas.com

Posted

I want to know who made the decision that allowed both teams to wear their away colors. Wouldn't have surprised me had a pass or two or three been misdirected.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use