Featured Jobs
|
BPAS
|
|
DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
|
|
BPAS
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
|
|
Retirement Combo Plan Administrator Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
|
|
Defined Benefit Specialist II or III Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Merkley Retirement Consultants
|
|
Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
|
|
The Pension Source
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
Search the News Archive
|
4 Matching News Items |
| 1. |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit via FindLaw
Sept. 17, 2001
"An individual must have filed timely charges of discrimination with the EEOC in order to file a claim of discrimination himself. See 29 U.S.C. sec. 626(d). Despite this filing requirement, the EEOC asks us to hold that it may bring suit for monetary damages even when none of the individuals on whose behalf it sues have filed timely charges." [EEOC v. North Gibson School Corp., No. 00-3117 (7th Cir. Sep. 11, 2001)]
|
| 2. |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit via FindLaw
July 24, 2001
"[W]e proceed to evaluate the agreement under general contract principles, without giving special weight to the intent of either party.... That said, 'the overriding purpose in construing a contract is to give effect to the mutual intent of the parties at the time the contract was made.'" [Bock v. Computer Associates International, Inc. and Platinum Technology, Inc., Nos. 00-2628 and 00-3348 (7th Cir. Jul. 28, 2001).]
|
| 3. |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit via FindLaw
Feb. 3, 2004
19 pages. Excerpt: The employees argue that the elapsed-time regulation violates the minimum standard, the vesting, and the benefit accrual provisions of ERISA because it fails to require the counting of hours of service.... Other courts have addressed the question ... We agree with the Second Circuit[,] the Seventh Circuit[,] and the Eighth Circuit ... and hold that the elapsed-time regulation does not violate ERISA. [Johnson v. Buckley, No. 02-17094 (9th Cir. Jan. 28, 2004)]
|
| 4. |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit via FindLaw
May 21, 2001
Excerpt: In July 1999, the Chicago Board of Education extended spousal health benefits to domestic partners--but only if the domestic partner was of the same sex as the employee, which excluded [female plaintiff Milagros] Irizarry's [male] domestic partner, an exclusion that she contends is unconstitutional. [Irizarry v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, No. 00-3216 (7th Cir. May 15, 2001)]
|
|
Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches
|