Jump to content

Bill Presson

Senior Contributor
  • Posts

    2,356
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    197

Everything posted by Bill Presson

  1. No. What would justify the 1099? There was no distribution.
  2. If the TPA is running the daily val platform, that would be the reason.
  3. I must admit I've never seen that in 35+ years, so I stand corrected.
  4. I think you think "pass them through" means that the participant can get the cash. That's not the case. It all stays in the plan.
  5. The OP wording just means that the NHCE worked 1000 hours in the first 12 months following date of hire. But vesting is based on calendar (ie plan) years and the NHCE didn't and won't ever have 1000 hours in that vesting measurement period.
  6. There was only one payroll in the last three months?
  7. Top heavy is a problem. If they're participants on the last day, they get top heavy minimums and likely required gateway. Doesn't matter what the allocation requirements are.
  8. Belgarath resurrected an old thread. He isn't talking about the same plan.
  9. Changing from a C corp to an S corp shouldn't require a new TIN. I doubt they created a new entity. They likely just filed form 2553 and elected to be taxed as an S. And the CPA should definitely know the deduction of plan contributions, good grief.
  10. just make sure the w-2 wages are paid to allow the contributions he/she wants to make. The S corp K-1 doesn't count.
  11. Well, they have to be a "distributee" and sounds like they aren't. So they don't even get to enter this section because they aren't tall enough yet to reach the line on the sign.
  12. What if you contacted Penchecks (or another trust paying agent) to see if the trustee could endorse the check to them and they pay it out to the IRA? They may not be able to take the check, but if they can, it keeps it out of the corporate account.
  13. CB is correct.
  14. I would welcome the day...
  15. 216F is a 5558 approval. Someone found it behind their desk and saw that it was filed timely so they approved it and sent it out.
  16. Correct.
  17. 02/24/23 Federal Register re: Annual Information Reports
  18. 1. BG, the $15k for 2022 would not be a TH contribution, but a contribution to 2022 to avoid TH in 2023. 2. what is happening to possibly trigger a needed TH contribution for 2023?
  19. I'm guessing Ms Nicole means another 401k account. That's typically what happens from the QDRO paperwork. The distribution requires another set. I don't understand the "not talking to you" part because once that account is set up, you're a participant in the plan, just like your ex.
  20. 1. Assuming he's not making deposits based on draws through the year and only deposits once, that really is his only pay period. 2. With that said, I really don't like when employers don't do a true up and I would highly encourage him (if he was my client) to do a true up. The employer needs to have budgeted the full match anyway and an employee shouldn't be harmed if they have to structure the timing of the deferrals differently through the year.
  21. 318 doesn't apply to controlled group attribution. That's 1563. This is very helpful: LFG controlled group link
  22. Was told it would be the end of February.
  23. Hope so as well. We've got a handful that we've done the termination amendment and we're waiting for our document provider to update the full term package.
  24. If they are working, the insurance can stay in place past retirement age. If they terminate, then it has to be surrendered or distributed at retirement age. If they've been gone for awhile by that time, you need to make sure the premiums are still within the incidental limits or the premiums become taxable distributions at that point.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use