Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Will someone please tell me that not even the DOL would be this rash?? There is literally nowhere else for the small plans to go...

http://lawtonrpc.com/lrpcs-weekly-insight-brokerage-account-windows-shutting-in-401k-plans/

What is the likely outcome? Most experts think the DoL will:

  • Establish fiduciary guidelines and limitations for offering brokerage account windows;
  • Require more notices for plan participants who have access to brokerage account windows;
  • Bar their use as the only investment option in a retirement plan; and

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

Will someone please tell me that not even the DOL would be this rash?? There is literally nowhere else for the small plans to go...

Not true.

They can have these "brokerage accounts" but the Trustees limit the funds allowed in the accounts to a predetermined schedule of investments (a "fund menu").

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

Great solution. As soon as brokerage account providers spend millions of dollars to revamp their software to provide for such limitations I promise to take it back. But I won't hold my breath. The Fidelity's and Schwabs and TD Ameritrades do not have that type of functionality. And as a general rule participants are given trading authority on the accounts because of course the Trustee would not want to be the one calling Fidelity to request trades.

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

Great solution. As soon as brokerage account providers spend millions of dollars to revamp their software to provide for such limitations I promise to take it back. But I won't hold my breath. The Fidelity's and Schwabs and TD Ameritrades do not have that type of functionality. And as a general rule participants are given trading authority on the accounts because of course the Trustee would not want to be the one calling Fidelity to request trades.

Frankly it would be nice if someone required the brokerage account providers to actually revamp their software and make them play nice instead of always requiring the Relius/Omni/SRT/ASC/Datair crowd to do so.

William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA
bill.presson@gmail.com
C 205.994.4070

 

Posted

masteff, I have no problem if they want to do away with the windows inside a larger plan. Because they have a viable option available. It's the 5 person plan with $100,000 that I would worry about. I don't even know what I would tell them to do. Honestly, there is no alternative that is priced below say 2%. Does anyone disagree with that? Well I guess American Funds RKD, but then they have to pay for recordkeeping out of pocket.

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

My former employer has an inexpensive bundled option for small plans. The trade off is that your document options are pretty seriously restricted and the client has to do a significant amount of the work. Send me a private message if you'd like to know more.

Posted

austin3515, the linked-to article mentions unnamed experts as the source of the idea that EBSA interpretations might make the use of securities accounts impractical. When I make a prediction about what a government agency will do, I stand behind it with my name.

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use