pixmax Posted May 6, 2019 Posted May 6, 2019 I have a control group of 10 companies, 1 plan that is excluding 9 companies and all Highly Compensated Employees. Am I correct that at least 70% of NHCE's need to be eligible to pass 410b? If company the total of all of companies NHCE's is 100 and only 7 are allowed to participate doesn't this fail?
BG5150 Posted May 6, 2019 Posted May 6, 2019 0% HCE and 7% NCHE is a pass, no? QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
pixmax Posted May 6, 2019 Author Posted May 6, 2019 I agree, but in my mind it doesn't seem fair that they are not allowing the other groups of NHCE's to participate.
justanotheradmin Posted May 6, 2019 Posted May 6, 2019 Its okay that the other NCHEs aren't allowed into the plan. The question is of ratios, if ZERO HCE are allowed into the plan, then the coverage test will pass even if the plan only covers 1 NHCE. We have a plan that wanted a specific match for a specific NHCE. They did not want the match for any other employee. It passes coverage. I'm a stranger on the internet. Nothing I write is tax or legal advice. I'd like a witty saying here, but I don't have any. When in doubt, what does the plan document say?
Kevin C Posted May 6, 2019 Posted May 6, 2019 A plan that benefits no highly compensated employees for the plan year automatically satisfies the 410(b) requirements with respect to employees. See 1.410(b)-2(b)(6). Mike Preston and Eve Sav 2
david rigby Posted May 6, 2019 Posted May 6, 2019 On 5/6/2019 at 12:17 PM, pixmax said: I agree, but in my mind it doesn't seem fair that they are not allowing the other groups of NHCE's to participate. In simple terms, "non-discrimination" tests are how "fairness" is defined. In most cases, this is a concept that compares HCEs relative to NHCEs. It does not prohibit discrimination within either category. (There are exceptions to the "comparison", such as the 415 limitation which is an example of absolute limits without comparing HCEs to NHCEs.) I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Luke Bailey Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 pixmax, would it be fairer if none of the companies in the controlled group had a plan, so no NHCEs or HCEs covered? Our current system does not require employers to sponsor plans, and the result you are encountering is consistent with that basic premise. Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now