justanotheradmin Posted August 26, 2024 Posted August 26, 2024 Company A has a traditional 401(k) plan with a safe harbor provision, no automatic enrollment, plan has been around several years, well before SECURE 2.0. Company B - does not have a plan. Company B owners - purchase Company A as an equity purchase as of 7/1/2023. Company B intends to become a participating employer in Company A's plan as of 1/1/2025. It is a control group. Assume the transition period runs until 12/31/2024. The two companies are similar in size for number of employees, about 30 each. Is the resulting plan exempt from the automatic enrollment rule of SECURE 2.0? Or would it need to add an automatic enrollment provision that satisfies SECURE 2.0 as of 1/1/2025? what say all you lovely people? I'm a stranger on the internet. Nothing I write is tax or legal advice. I'd like a witty saying here, but I don't have any. When in doubt, what does the plan document say?
Popular Post C. B. Zeller Posted August 26, 2024 Popular Post Posted August 26, 2024 Notice 2024-02 describes several situations involving plan mergers and indicates that if the surviving plan includes a pre-enactment qualified CODA, then the plan is not subject to the automatic enrollment mandate. In this case there is no plan merger, simply another adopting employer. So it seems to me that since there is only one plan involved, and that plan includes a pre-enactment qualified CODA, that the plan is not subject to the automatic enrollment mandate. Lou S., Peter Gulia, Luke Bailey and 2 others 4 1 Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co
Peter Gulia Posted August 26, 2024 Posted August 26, 2024 Of Internal Revenue Code § 414A and SECURE 2022 § 101, many interpretations are possible. Miscellaneous Changes Under the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022, Notice 2024-2, 2024–2 I.R.B. 316 (Jan. 8, 2024), at its part II.A, describes some partial interpretations; but none that addresses your question. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb24-02.pdf While an employer might like C.B. Zeller’s reasoning, here’s the practical question: How much confidence does your client need or want? How much lack of confidence would your client tolerate? This is not advice to anyone. justanotheradmin 1 Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now