Bill Presson

Paid to the employer???

Your w-2 sentence answers your question.

Agree with Gilmore and with Jak.

Agree with this. Be careful the document allows what you're trying to do.

When I first read the title, I couldn't figure out how how a cancellation created a powerpoint.

I really think you should be asking your actuary and CPA these questions.

This is why I recommend allowing changes each payroll. Employers are so wary of this, but it's very rarely an issue. The only way this might not fix the issue is if the bonuses are paid on a regular paycheck and not separately.

https://www.napa-net.org/news-info/daily-news/nyc-moves-establish-auto-ira-program

And the sponsor keeps it as evidence of the attempt.

That's a fascinating way to look at it.

I just found out that Lou Filliger passed away last August. If you spent more than a day on PIX, you would remember him. Strong opinions on just about everything and an incredibly avid hiker. I never got the opportunity to meet him in person and I'm very sad about that. RIP, Lou.

Also, the amendment could have been written to apply differently to different employees by hire date, if preferred. So it could have said that it was only applicable to all those hired on or after 1/1/21, for example.

Not sure you two are saying the same things.

1. Yes 2. No

Understood. But FTW actually provides a Spanish version SPD. I thought Relius did as well.

1. It shocks me that Relius doesn't have it available because FTW does and I thought most of the document providers would. 2. I wasn't aware that speaking English was required to work. /sarcasm off 3. There are requirements for appropriate notices in a language if the plan covers a large enough group that is literate only in that language.

That shocks me. I would have sworn they provided Spanish versions of the participant material. Wow.

Most (if not all) of the document providers that I've seen provide this as an option.

I've never understood why people write weird provisions in the plan and then ignore them.

Yes, as long as the plan year is less than six months. I've seen it done a number of times and it should not be an issue.

True. Picky is important.

If the plan is safe harbor match in 2021, it doesn't matter if only the owner contributes to the plan, there's no required top heavy contribution.

SHM doesn't do double duty, but I didn't see anything asked about 2020. The whole thing said it would be top heavy in 2021 and the top heavy contribution in 2021 would be large. I don't think that's accurate. Maybe there are questions about 2020, but they weren't asked by the OP.

Did I miss something? If it's safe harbor match for 2021, then the top heavy status is irrelevant.

Agreed that most do not. But most do not calculate the RMD either unless it's an IRA. And when it's an IRA, most do prepare the 1099-r. So it's a bit of a mixed bag here. The paperwork for the account or the request to prepare the RMDs will specify, I would think.