Bill Presson

But won't this apply if it's a COVID distribution? Q7. May I repay a coronavirus-related distribution? A7. In general, yes, you may repay all or part of the amount of a coronavirus-related distribution to an eligible retirement plan, provided that you complete the repayment within three years after the date that the distribution was received. If you repay a coronavirus-related distribution, the distribution will be treated as though it were repaid in a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer so that you do not owe federal income tax on the distribution. If, for example, you receive a coronavirus-related distribution in 2020, you choose to include the distribution amount in income over a 3-year period (2020, 2021, and 2022), and you choose to repay the full amount to an eligible retirement plan in 2022, you may file amended federal income tax returns for 2020 and 2021 to claim a refund of the tax attributable to the amount of the distribution that you included in income for those years, and you will not be required to include any amount in income in 2022. See sections 4.D, 4.E, and 4.F of Notice 2005-92 for additional examples.

Gotcha!

Correct. But I would assume yesterday is the original filing date if the 5558 was due yesterday.

If it was me, I would recommend the client use DFVCP, especially if it's a small filer. $1,500 is a small price to pay for peace of mind.

HA!

Why don't you provide disability insurance instead of allowing people to use their retirement money?

I have no objection to this at all as long as it's in a specific section.

I'm not opposed to him posting. I just don't want to see them. But the ignore user option doesn't work for the thread starter.

Correct. I sent him a private message link.

This is a good idea. Maybe he'll believe that.

Sounds like Peter Gibbons explaining what is happening.

It's not. Just not a fan of constant advertisement type posts. If one wanted to do that and had been interacting for a while, I would feel differently.

Employers sponsor retirement plans, individuals (outside of IRAs) do not.

Unfortunately I've learned that it doesn't work when the ignored poster starts a new topic. 🙄

Dave, I do see that. Now I have to search to find the specific screen name I need. I was expecting it to be something like a click on the user's profile and that's where I've been hunting. Thank you very much!

I would have sworn there was an option to mute someone but I cannot find it. Maybe it never existed?

Acquired by ASC a few years ago.

Real estate agents are almost always independent contractors. That's the way that world works. Keep in mind that the SEP sponsor is the Real Estate Firm and not the 40 year old. So the contribution eligibility and contributions apply to anyone that is receiving earned income from the firm. Also, I'm always nervous when someone says "no qualified plan to speak of." They either do or they don't.

Was there an amendment to actually create the short year for each plan? That usually defines what's going to happen to the accruals.

without looking at anything, i'm pretty sure that's not kosher. But they could still adopt a PS plan for 2020 and merge it into the 401(k) plan in 2021.

None of us understand who is getting the PPP money, who is the PC, who is the employer, who is the plan sponsor and who is reimbursing whom for what. It just doesn't make any sense. Way to many players it seems.

You still need a plan with individual groups in order to vary the contribution by person.

When did the common ownership occur? Does the 15% owner of Company B work for Company B?

We aren't charging a restatement fee for any client that hired us in the past year.

Why would the "client" receive PPP money and not his PC?? Is the client also an employer? This is still confusing.