Because deferred deductions were taken out with FICA already considered so that when we pay distributions we only take Fed W/H. What about when the participant has passed? 

We have a plan that allows for two loans. A participant was mistakenly allowed a third loan. The loan policy specifically states that loan re negotiations are not allowed. Assume the participant cannot pay the third loan back  in full nor do they want to default and claim on taxes. Are their any other options available? Can we still merge two loans together since it is for a correction despite the loan policy? Could we amend the loan policy to allow loan renegotiation? then amend again "to go back" say a month or two later? VCP? 

I have a prospective client who has a non-Erisa 403(b) for the NHCEs to defer, and an ERISA 403(b) for the charter founders to defer and get a PS contribution.  We've been called in because while the non-ERISA document excludes charter founders and the ERISA document excludes everyone else, a founder had been deferring to the non-Erisa plan and got a profit sharing contribution in the Erisa plan (she did not defer to the Erisa plan).

My questions are - can you set the plans up this way - ie can you aggregate the non-Erisa and Erisa plans to make sure the NHCEs aren't discriminated against for coverage, and if so, does it all get messed up with having the 1 founder deferring into the non-Erisa plan (I know it violates the document but it only happened this year so we should be able to amend the doc to permit it).

Thoughts?

An employee stock ownership plan was most recently amended in January 2017 (and then included everything through the “2016 Required Amendments List for Qualified Retirement Plans”) .

The employer/sponsor/administrator anticipates ending the plan and paying its final distributions in 2019.

Beyond stating the discontinuance and termination, is there any plan amendment needed to tax-qualify the plan for its end?

Can someone provide me some pro's and con's on each type of contribution?

1.  After Tax Contribution to 401k plan

2.  Mega Back Door Roth Contribution

Normally the plans we work on are just pretax 401k and roth 401k.

Thank you.

One person plan for a doctor - for the beginning five years of the plan, the doctor is not vested in the profit sharing contribution. Inasmuch as a plan is meant to be more permanent than 5 years, how to explain to plan owner that the money is theirs even if they are not vested at the current time in the first five years? (in this example, plan started when employment started).

Large nonprofit health systems are being approached frequently by consultants offering proposal to rescind executives 409A/457(f) SERPs in direct exchange for split dollar loan regime arrangement of substantially equal value (but generally a very different "payment" time/form than under the 409A/457(f) SERP).  Push for these proposals now seems to be to help nonprofit employer avoid or reduce 4960 excise taxes where these SERP values would exceed $1M at vesting.  Anybody seeing these along with the legal opinions from the promoters that these "swaps" "should not" run afoul of 409A or 457(f)??  Thoughts on whether this violates anti-substitution/anti-exchange rules under 409A/457(f) and if not - why? 

If an executive and employer bilaterally agreed to cancel SERP in exchange for loan regime split dollar arrangement, should executive insist on indemnification from employer for potential 409A/457(f) infractions/penalties if the promoter's "should be ok" doesn't ultimately align with IRS views on audit - or even at Tax Court?

I appreciate any insight as to how these proposals are being greeted by employer's counsel.

Having one of those days. For a cross tested plan, I know the total contribution cannot exceed 25% of total eligible comp, but what about on individual level? Can I give one HCE say 40% profit sharing it if passes all the tests (gateway, avg benefit, and say rate group using midpoint)? 

Suppose you have a 401(k) plan with a safe harbor match. The plan had a 6/30/18 plan year end. An HCE made salary deferrals of $18,000 from 7/1/17 through 6/30/18 ($18,500 for 2018). However he mistakenly funded an additional $500 on the next pay period on 7/15/2018 (now $19,000 for 2018). 

To correct this, the plan refunded the $500 plus earnings to him shortly after the extra $500 was funded.

That extra $500 was technically funded during the 7/1/2018 - 6/30/2019 year. He funded no salary deferrals for the year ended 6/30/2019 (other than the mistaken $500). Should he get the match on that $500 even though it was refunded to him?

Thanks.

In a plan where everyone is in self-directed brokerage accounts, two of the doctors (of course) have stumbled onto a non-publicly-traded stock that they want to buy.  The financial advisor can't get them access to it through his platform, and the doctors aren't old enough for in-service distributions of any sizable amounts, so they are looking to change brokers to get access to this asset in the plan.

The asset itself has a minimum - I've heard varying accounts of either $25K or $10K to buy in.  Is that in and of itself discriminatory?  If it's $25K, then no one else besides the doctors have that much in their accounts (at least as of 12/31/18).  But what if it's $10K - pretty much everyone has that much.

In general, I am pessimistic about the 3(16) business model, but I get that there are aspects of it that appeal to clients.  My question is, do I have the latitude to pick and choose which things I will offer as a 3(16)?  So for example, I think it rather unappealing to clients to take over the deposit process because most clients want to be involved in ACHing funds out of their own operating account.  But I think in general clients LOVE the idea of a TPA signing off on distributions.

Signing a form 5500 - not a big deal since I already prepare a signature ready form.  But responsibility for sending out notices?  Quite appealing.

So the question is, can I have a "3(16)-lite" offering, charge a little bit more for it, and take over those things that are the most value added (emphasis on the word value).

I already understand the concept behind the full suite of services, so no need to sell me on that!

Hi QDRO Specialists,

In a divorce situation, both parties established 401(K) with new employers after the date of separation (in CA). These 401(K)s are separate properties belonging to each party but opened with marital status as 'Married'. Is a QDRO needed to update marital status and beneficiary post-divorce?

QRDO is needed to divide community property 401(K). But in a situation where both parties decide to retain their respective 401(K) and forever waive rights to this community property (similar amounts), is a QDRO needed to update marital status and beneficiary post-divorce? i.e. Is QDRO needed to waive these rights?

Finally, is it correct to assume that QDRO doesn't apply to IRA rollover and Roth IRA accounts?

Thanks for your comments.

George

I’m considering selling my TPA practice. I’d like to hear feedback on the process from anyone who has gone through this experience. 

.

I'm taking over a plan that has immediate force-outs in the document for VAB <$5,000.  I suspect that provision was not followed by the prior TPA, and based on how the assets are set up (individual brokerage accounts) and the fact that we won't be monitoring the plan on a daily basis, it doesn't seem like the right fit for this plan.  Is it a cutback to change this to happening after the end of the year of termination in the document?  Thanks.

Hello, will someone please provide me with an IRS direct Email address or Address. This is regarding a Tax-, qualified plan, under [(401(a) that is subject to 401(a)(13)(B) and to 414(p). Seems like a simple question, but I just cannot find the appropriate Address nor email address.  

Thought I'd throw this question out there: Non profit has started a new 401(k) plan for contributions moving forward. The legacy 403(b) is being left as is with no new contributions, but there remains a large forfeiture account, which exceeds payable fees.  Can such forfeiture account be transferred directly to the new 401(k) account to be used for employer contributions over there?

I am trying to figure out if the Scorp HSA contribution for a more than 2% owner is subject to UI / SDI in CA on quarterly forms.

I am aware that the S-corp HSA contribution needs to be entered on W2 in Box 14 and that Box 1 and Box 16 (State) needs to have the HSA amount of $6900 included .

I have contacted a CPA and was told that Health insurance and HSA are only subject to FIT / SIT not UI / SDI .

Is this correct for CA ? 

The payroll provider did not include the HSA to be taxed for UI/SDI only PIT wages on Ca Quaterly DE9c.  Is this correct ? 

The Edd information sheets states employer contribution to HSA is subject to UI/ SDI is the info sheet referring to non 2% employees who have the contribution reported in box 12W instead of Box 14 for 2% shareholders? 

I would like to know that payroll is correctly paying my taxes . 

Plan defines comp as W-2 comp, but does not include post-severance pay for Deferrals, match or non-elective contributions.

Terminated participant received severance pay, but we don't know yet exactly what constituted the severance pay.  Would assume at least part of final check was unpaid vacation, sick leave, etc., and possible customary 2 weeks "severance pay".

Question is, do we include all or part of the severance pay in calculation of SH NEC or not?

I’ve been out of the business for a few years, in that time QDIAs came into being. My employer (a TPA) is telling me the QDIA notice requirements fall on the fund companies we work with (examples: Transamerica, Nationwide, Voya, Hancock) and the Plan’s financial advisor. We as TPA do nothing with the QDIA notice. This doesn’t seem right to me. I had a financial advisor tell me he expects the TPA to take care of it. How do other TPA firms handle the QDIA notice requirements? 

Ten-year-old ESOP, loan is now paid off.  We're planning for 2020 and trying to determine how much to pay the terminees.  Plan provides for typical 5 installments for distributions over $5,000 in the year following the year in which the loan is paid off.  For example, a participant retired in 2017 with a $100,000 benefit was supposed to begin receiving distributions in 2018, but did not due to the outstanding loan.  In 2020, does he receive $60,000 ($20,000 for 2018, 2019 and 2020)?  Or does he receive $33,000 (1 of 3 remaining installments due)?